Chelsea Clinton has become very active on Twitter.

Some have speculated that Chelsea, who has always been rather private, is now trying to set up a social media presence for a future political run.

She even gets an assist from the New York Times who reports that Chelsea actually read a book.

Chelsea Clinton first read “Fahrenheit 451” in the 7th grade, and “it still makes me uncomfortable" https://t.co/j9YpGGTOJE

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1464204305408-0'); });

— The New York Times (@nytimes) February 23, 2017

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1481811813211-1'); });

But so far every effort she makes in her social media foray just seems to backfire.

Here’s her latest.

She saw this tweet about Rex Tillerson.

Rex Tillerson testified in 2010 that there was no competent method to predict climate change. #VICEonHBO pic.twitter.com/faqZJLOfz7

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1448050117784-4'); });

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1464204305408-1'); });

— VICE News (@vicenews) February 25, 2017

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1481811813211-3'); });

She gave this attempt at a witty response.

Ummm… The scientific method? https://t.co/YNhYkBDRrq

— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) February 25, 2017

The Internet lets her know they don’t think she knows about what she speaks.

Good idea. What parameters will you be measuring and how will you be controlling the experiment? https://t.co/6fl0BVhOoH

— Adam R. Maxwell (@maxwellarm) February 25, 2017

Given the huge gap between predicted and actual temperatures, actual science requires you to reject climate models. https://t.co/2jylQq32GO

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) February 25, 2017

@ChelseaClinton I don't think the scientific method means what you think it does

— Bill O'Keefe (@DefendWallSt) February 25, 2017

If Earth is the test group in this experiment, @ChelseaClinton, what is the control group? https://t.co/gAj2KHlORl

— Huxley's Ghost™ (@AF632) February 25, 2017

that’s not a climate model RT @ChelseaClinton: Ummm… The scientific method? https://t.co/XRpNXQuVuX

— Derp State (@ThatElJefe) February 25, 2017

When someone tries to sound smart and says something exceedingly stupid. https://t.co/VkMdOObYik

— Ross (@indyrallen) February 25, 2017

Did she really graduate Stanford, Oxford and Columbia?

Perhaps Chelsea should reconsider this social media foray.

There’s that old maxim about it being better to remain silent than to open one’s mouth and be proved a fool.

While she may not be doing much to make anyone think she knows what she’s talking about, she is at least giving conservatives lots of fodder for laughs…