You are what you say we are: Bigots — Matt Walsh DESTROYS gay rights fascists



Screen Shot 2014-04-05 at 9.00.33 PM

[tabs_head][tab_title]The Matt Walsh Blog:[/tab_title][/tabs_head]

Dear gay rights militants, dear progressive tyrants, dear liberal fascists, dear haters of free speech, dear crusaders for ideological conformity, dear left wing bullies:

You will lose.

I know you’ve got legions of sycophants kowtowing to you these days, and the rest you’ve set out to destroy — but you will lose.

So, you’ve tracked another dissident and skinned him alive. You’ve made an example of Brendan Eich, and now you dance joyously around his disemboweled carcass. You have his head on a spike, and you consider this a conquest in your eternal crusade to eradicate diversity and punish differing opinions. You launched your millionth campaign of intimidation, and now another good man has been dragged through the mud, to the sounds of taunting and jeering and death threats.

You found out that the CEO of Mozilla gave a few dollars to support a pro-traditional marriage ballot measure several years ago, and you proceeded to publicly tar and feather him until he was forced to ‘resign’ in disgrace.

You again chose to forgo debate, in favor of coercion and bullying.

You again attempted to end the ‘gay rights’ argument by defrocking your opponent.

Hey, good for you.

Enjoy the spoils of your cowardice.

It won’t last.

You will still lose.

Don’t you people read? Haven’t you learned anything from history? ‘Advancements’ earned through tyranny never endure. You can only win a debate by suffocating your opposition for so long. Your strategy is doomed for failure, because it has always failed.

In the name of ‘fighting for the freedom to love,’ you’ve utilized hate. For the sake of ‘tolerance,’ you’ve wielded bigotry. In order to push ‘diversity,’ you’ve been dogmatic.

You are everything you accuse your opponents of being, and you stand for all the evil things that you claim they champion.

You are exposed. We see you for what you are: a force of destruction and division.

You showed your hand, and now you’ll lose the game.

It’s inevitable.

Marriage has, had, and always will have, by definition, a certain character and purpose; a character and purpose centered around, above all things, the family. Marriage is the foundation through which a thriving and lasting civilization sees to the propagation of itself. Human beings can only reproduce by means of ‘heterosexuality,’ and this reality sets the ‘heterosexual’ union apart. Marriage is meant to be the context in which this reproduction occurs.

Marriage is many things, but it is also this. And ‘this’ can never be removed from it, no matter the direction of the political winds, or the motion of the shifting sands of public opinion.

Marriage and the family are dimensions of the same whole. They cannot be detached from one another. They, as a whole, as an institution, can only be weakened — not erased or redefined. And so the campaign to protect and strengthen the institution was and is designed to do just that. It was never about ‘legislating love’ or imposing intolerance or ‘discriminating against gay people,’ or any other silly bumper sticker platitude.

You want to be free to love? You are. You always have been.

Heterosexuals don’t claim to monopolize love; only reproduction. Me, I love in many ways and in many directions. I love my wife, yes, and I also love my parents, and my country, and football, and hamburgers. These are all different kinds and degrees of love, yet still love.

But, alas, only one of these loves can (or should) result in the creation of a biological family. Thus, this love carries with it a certain distinction and a certain responsibility.

Bigotry? There is nothing bigoted about it. This is mere science. You see, bigotry only enters into the conversation when you try to destroy a man’s life just for participating in the conversation.

You are the agents of bigotry, my friends. You. You are what you say we are.

I don’t know much about Brendan Eich, and neither do you. I know that he is a revolutionary mind in his field and he became the CEO of Mozilla because of his professional merits. That’s all the information I would have ever seen as relevant or important. But none of that matters to you. You decided to cast all of that aside because you took a peek at the names of Prop 8 donors — names that were only publicized in order to punish and shame those who supported the measure — and determined that everyone listed must be punished.

You fancy yourselves the ideological descendants of civil rights pioneers, but these tactics put you in the same vein as book burners and Puritan witch hunters. When your story is ultimately told, it’ll read more like The Crucible than the Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr.

And that’s why you’ll lose.

You might have fooled society forever if you’d just kept singing about love and kindness, and never started bombarding Christians with your bitter hate and hostility. You might have gained some lasting ground if you hoisted your banner of free love, and never used it to diminish free speech.

But the proverbial cat is out of the bag. You’ve been made.

Because of your own behavior, when people like myself tell the world about the vicious death wishes and vulgar hate mail we receive from your kind on a DAILY basis, everyone will believe us. It’s no secret anymore. Without question and without exaggeration, the ‘gay rights movement’ is the angriest, most ruthless, most controlling, most intolerant of all the ideological enterprises in the country. Now, everyone knows it.

So you’ll lose. People are starting to see that you are the pigs on this Animal Farm, and the equality of which you preach is a very unequal equality indeed.

Let other conservatives write the ‘woe is me’ posts. In truth, woe is you. One way or another.

You’ll lose. You’ll lose for these reasons, and this:

With each passing day, it gets harder and harder for you to control the conversation.

Eich’s greatest contribution to combating gay rights militants didn’t come in the form of a paltry donation to Prop 8 — it came through his work developing the medium that makes censorship nearly impossible. I’m not saying that was his motivation, but it’s the result. You can boycott Reality TV shows and fast food restaurants all you want, but you can’t shutdown the internet.

For all its downside, the internet still gives voice to people who would be otherwise silenced by oppressors like yourselves. Take yours truly, for example. I’m just one dude — insignificant and unimportant — but there are many like me. I’m not employed by any major corporation. I’m not employed at all, in fact. You can’t get me fired; I work for myself.

You can’t muzzle me, or anyone else out here in the wild wilderness of cyberspace. You can keep sending us mean emails and telling us to kill ourselves (thanks for the helpful suggestion!), but that only emboldens us.

In the meantime, in honor of Mozilla and the gay rights fascists, I’ve talked with my wife and we’ve decided to donate a portion of our monthly ad revenue to the fight to protect the sanctity of life and marriage. So thank you for reading this — you are directly contributing to the ‘anti-gay rights’ cause!

See, you can’t win.

Victimize one guy and you simply succeed in creating a thousand others who are sufficiently fed up with your garbage.

You still lose.

The truth prevails.

Always.

Regards,

Matt Walsh

 
Share This on Facebook

  • Harry Myers

    Bravo Matt. One of the thousands.

    • TomRosey

      Awesome article. Period. Well stated. Game on.

      • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

        Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one man and one woman… Nobody, including conservatives, will admit it…

        Taking sides in the conflicts between devils is not the path to Salvation.

        All men are born of a woman… The ecclesiastic gaytheists and fagnostics will never admit it.

        They think that if they tattoo an “M” on both cheeks they will have a baby because it spells “mom” when they bend over.

        • WinstonBlakeLULZ

          . . .

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            Reynolds v. United States in 1878 is where “separation of church and state” became a precedent of case law…

            You illiterate, ignorant fággot.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      The idea “thou shalt marry and be given in marriage” is corrupt and degenerate, which is an impossible immortality of a kind (i.e., eternal love), but not of the persons of men. The government of men’s external actions by religion, pretending the change of nature in their consecrations cannot be esteemed a work extraordinary, it is no other than a conjuration or incantation, whereby they would have men to believe an alteration of nature that is contrary to the testimony of sight and of all the rest of the senses.

      The praeterpolitical power of the churches to institute monogamy as an ecclesiastic rule of law enabled them to determine the legitimacy of the succession of the pagan kings, abrogate the natural rights to property and self-defense, as well as gave them power of ecclesiastic censure for divorce.

      These ecclesiastic gaytheists and fagnostics would have men believe they will receive condign punishment for their contumacy of monogamy, as opposed to the freedom of the polygamy found in nature, which is inherently pagan and heterosexual… all men are born of a woman…

      Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one man and one woman…

      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        . . . .

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Gehen sie saugen eine Schrotflinte…

  • Alexander Higgs

    Fantastic article! Expertly written! Genius in delivery! Thank you for being a voice that the majority of Americans speak with at the dinner table in spite of the rouse that the media exploits that America is headed in a “new direction”. Evil only ensues when good men stand by and do nothing, and you sir, are at the tip of the spear, with many behind you, at doing a great work!

    God speed and Semper Fi!

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake
      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        CHURCH AND STA-… nvm I won’t even bother…

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Reynolds v. United States in 1878 is where “separation of church and state” became a precedent of case law…

          You illiterate fággot.

          • Pax Humana

            Joseph controlled the nation of Ophir as a part of a much larger than previously thought Egyptian Empire and Ophir was at least as large as the USA, and not only was that the truth, but that, and here is the kicker, Ophir IS the USA in ancient times, so such a historical revisionist argument has been made by yourself has been made moot once again by a series of discoveries over the past thirty years in various places in the USA, Winston Blake. Finally, that Nathaniel guy is a New World Order and Illuminati shill, sir.

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            Ben Dragon Sipariş duyuyorum… Satanism is a Jewish cult… The Synagogue of Sodomy… all men are born of a woman…

            Satan is a Judengeist (a Jewish spirit)… the Baphomet, or the decadent hermaphrodite Goat of Khar, as often depicted comes from Eliphas Levi.

            The Baphomet sigil has five Hebrew letters that abbreviates another Jewish mythos: “Leviathan.” (Never mind that the “Church of Satan” from San Francisco, was founded by Howard Levey, a jew, under the pseudonym Anton LaVey.) What’s interesting is that the Ten Commandments you ecclesiastic gaytheist and fagnostic idiots are always protesting also comes from the Jewish religion, so we can safely say that Satanism is just another Jewish cult.

            (judaic bolshevist mammonism) baphomet = mahomet (muslim brotherhood)

            – – same devil

          • Pax Humana

            You are a New World Order and Illuminati shill, Winston Blake the Fake.

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            I’m a British skinhead, you stupid goat fúcker…

  • Michelle W.

    Thank you for always condensing the conservative, religious viewpoint down to the truest, most essential points. I finish with your posts and feel empowered. You always cut thru the bull crap and smoke and mirrors and lay out the truth without fear. God bless!

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      born gay = birth defect
      gay marriage = religious faggotry
      evolution = heterosexual
      extinction = homosexual
      abortion = prenatal summary execution
      death penalty = postnatal abortion
      genetically modified = eugenics
      more taxes = more police = more of a police state
      moderate muslim = out of bullets
      satanism = jewish cult

      • Jeff_Selbst

        Wow, so you’re an anti-Semite as well as a homophobic right-wing sicko. Figures.

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Ben Dragon Siparis duyuyorum… bir av tufegi emmek git, ibne yahudi…

          • WinstonBlakLULZ

            someone call the exorcist…

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            you can’t afford a phone?

        • marylamb72

          So, the left wing whackos don’t want to be judged by the sicko’s who kill prolifers but it’s ok for you to judge all of us by the statements of one.
          Yup Left wing INtolerance shows it’s ugly face again. Not surprised.

          • Jeff_Selbst

            “Sickos who kill pro-lifers?” You must be on drugs. The only killing has been by anti-abortionists who’ve got TWO doctors’ scalps on their belts: Barnet Slepian and George Tiller. And the killers of both men are treated as heroes by the right. Your hypocrisy and lack of morals is utterly typical of the right. And completely vomit-worthy.

          • marylamb72

            YOU are the one on drugs. Liberal kool aid. James Pouillon shot multiple times in Florida. “Associated Press reported that the killer shot Pouillon because he was irritated by the pro-life demonstrations.”
            Not surprised you didn’t know about it. Or maybe you’re just not admitting it. Admittedly the guy was a wacko and I don’t usually judge a whole GROUP by one whacko but since YOU think it’s the right way I guess by YOUR standards that makes YOU a left wing murdering whacko right?

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            These ecclesiastic gaytheists and fagnostics would have men believe they will receive condign punishment for their contumacy of monogamy, as opposed to the freedom of the polygamy found in nature, which is inherently pagan and heterosexual… all men are born of a woman…

            Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one man and one woman…

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          ——–

        • Pax Humana

          Heterophobes AND bigots BOTH annoy me and BOTH have earned my equal ire. Does anyone want to test my limits before I make you regret that decision in your lives?

      • WintsonBlakeLULZ

        so much equality!!! YAY

  • Lacey Holland

    Amazing article! Absolutely brilliant!

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      “When the fairies are displeased with anybody, they are said to send their elves to pinch them. The ecclesiastics, when they are displeased with any civil state, make also their elves, that is, superstitious, enchanted subjects, to pinch their princes, by preaching sedition; or one prince, enchanted with promises, to pinch another.”

      Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan, 1651

      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        erm

  • reshas1

    Perfect read after debating someone who is comparing gay rights with civil rights. after asking my husband who is black and a conservative, he thinks it is total bs.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      All men are born of a woman.

      Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one man and one woman…

      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        . . . . .

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Bit av tufegi emmek git…

    • mmercier0921

      There is 0 correlation between civil rights and homosexuality.

      Blacks never had to get in your face and damand you recognize their person. It was obvious. Years back, I was going to declare a civil union with my roommate to get on his health insurance.

      Our girlfriends blew that one… one ratted us out to personnel.

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        There is much correlation between the two. l”Backs never had to get in your face and damand you recognize their person.” Laughable! That is exactly what we had to do. And I’m not sure why your being a stain says anything against gay marriage or civil unions.

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Tikkun Olam paganism and Judaic word fetishism coming from linguists like Naom Chomsky over at M.I.T. use the Talmud and Zohar as a blueprint for an illusion of a parallel and false reality.

          Like the Jew who dry humps the Wailing Wall like Miley Cyrus trying to achieve an erotic union with their “Shekinah,” a masturbatory cosmos maker… or miss neo-kabbalah Madonna, “Like a Virgin”…

          While Leon Puñettas was so busy with gay pride celebrations at the Pentagon, three Navy Seals and a U.S. ambassador were murdered, all because everyone was being so fúcking gay…

          You people just can’t stop playing with your dícks… you think that if you tattoo an “M” on both cheeks of your áss you will have a baby because it spells “mom” when you bend over.

    • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

      My experience has been that many black conservatives take issue with the civil rights movement itself. So it’s not surprising that some take issue with gay rights, too. Rest assured that many of the surviving leaders of the civil rights movement support gay rights. I trust them a little more than your husband. A number of black cons don’t even believe in the public accommodations clause of the CRA. Is your husband one of those?

      • I_RIGHT_I

        It’s unlikely you’ve ever met a Black conservative. Black cons though I can believe.

        • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

          Same thing aren’t they? And also, you’re wrong. See my Twitter account https://twitter.com/chrisLrob or my youtube page: https://www.youtube.com/user/chrislrob/videos where I address and interact with black cons(ervatives) regularly.

          • I_RIGHT_I

            Thanks I will. It should be interesting to get that perspective from someone who is actually literate.

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            The U.S. State Dept. has been infested with communists since WW1 and Woodrow Wilson, they tried to steal the Russian elections for their comrades in the Russian Communist Party through non-profit n.g.o.s… just like at home in America… But Vladimir Putin beat them… so they launched a fággot jihad against the Russian Orthodox church over the the punk rock band and the Olympics (something Romney also piled onto).

            When Marine Le Pen can face criminal prosecution (in France of all places) for criticizing Islam in context with existing French laws, there is something rotten.

            Francois Hollande is a Sodom Hussein Obama sycophant… they are both lawn jockeys for the Jewish globalist financiers flooding Europe with the Muslims who are just witless pawns of their “destabilization” policies all across Europe, the Middle East and the Americas.

  • Anonymous

    Despicable article you worthless fucking pig. Fucking waste of oxygen. See others can use insults too. You won’t win you backwards hick, You will lose, The truth does prevail. And you and your followers will go down in history as worthless bigots.

    • jme101

      @ Anonymous be really careful with the backwards hicks shit. I know you want this to be about race but most Blacks and Hispanics don’t agree with the lifestyle especially not gay marriage.

    • Anon

      I’m cool with stringing him up if you’re right next to him.

    • American Proud

      You make his point with the rhetoric you spew..Hate comes from the heart and yours must be blacker than black..People like you are the ones who make people like me not want to even listen to what you have to say..Grow Up, this is not the 3rd grade playground!! This man was bullied for having an opinion that doesn’t reflect your own….It’s exactly what the LGBT community has cried about for hundreds of years..The TRUTH is, this way of thinking, the bullying and the hate speech is only going to deminish your cause…The TRUTH is you are a BIGOT who chooses to hide behind vile comments!!

    • guest

      You just proved his point. The vile insults, the child-like hissy fit …… yrp. He called it right.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      “Perhaps he is wondering why you would shoot a man before throwing him out of a plane.”

      While Leon Puñettas was so busy with gay pride celebrations at the Pentagon, three Navy Seals and a U.S. ambassador were murdered, all because everyone was being so fúcking gay…

      You people just can’t stop playing with your dícks…

      Who is going to fight a war against the Russians with cúm drunk morons like you in charge?

      “Nobody cared about who I was until I put on the mask.”

    • Allan Theobald

      As I said it’s driven by marxist ideology and a hate for American Capitalism.

    • mmercier0921

      Were you mommies special child…?

      Dime a dozen today. Too bad yer only 2%… wait till they get to deal with the tender mercies of the hispanic/negro/muslim majority coming.

    • EdwardT

      …but you will STILL be a filthy pervert.

    • PDQuig

      As long as homosexuals depend upon the forbearance of the rest of us to survive, perhaps you should reconsider your hated-filled response to those who have history and biology on our side. You are well into the process of pushing people too far.

    • Mark Hales

      I’m going to go out on a limb here…I don’t think Anonymous is a real commenter. I think He/she is, I believe, a construct to give rise, in this forum, to Walsh’s assertions of reverse bigotry. That said, the comments above and below from the likes of Winston Blake, mmeercier0921, and Allan Theobald are exactly the kind of abuse that has been hurled at Gay Americans for years. Are you reading this Mr. Walsh?

    • Alleena

      Please keep this post. It showcases exactly what the gay mafia does. They curse copiously, always insult, and never, never say anything of substance. Like spoiled toddlers, they scream and curse and throw endless tantrums. They look ridiculous and are too self-centered to realize it. Truth? You don’t know the meaning of the word.

  • Mark Hales

    Impressive, complete poppycock, but impressive, really. That said, gay rights won’t lose, because they’ve already won. You’ve neglected and important fact from the “history” you claim they (Gay Americans) don’t read, all the tactics you laid our in self congratulatory, high fiving, ball spiking, victory lap of an article are the one straight people have been using to discredit or “defrock,” them for the last two hundred years. Sometimes when people play dirty, you have to play dirtier. I would further point out that millions of Americans marry every year that do not produce children, by choice, as result of their union. So I would ask you, are their marriages any less valid? Mr. Eich, despite his contribution to the internet, will survive. As will all of you, who will have to live in a world were anyone who wants to can marry whomever the like, because no matter how much you scream, whine, stamp your feet and hold your breath until you turn blue, your marriage, your relationship and your world view won’t suffer one iota as a result of same sex-marriage. Move on.

    • Ricard

      “…your relationship and your world view won’t suffer one iota as a result of same sex-marriage…”

      Nice little lie…tell it to the bakers and photographers now out of business just for exercising their 1st Amendment rights. Or Mr. Eich who your kind bullied out of a job just because he legitimately participated in the political process. The main point of marriage is not to change those who enter into it they’ve already made their decision), but those who come in contact with the married couple (c.f. Chai Feldblum, gay marriage advocate). Andrew Sullivan is quite correct; people like you have become the kinde you originally claim to hate.

      • Mark Hales

        I noticed you ignored the central premise, that the LGBT community is only using the same tactics that have been used against them…an inconvenient truth, but a truth, nonetheless. Further, Jim Crow used to be the rule rather than the exception, and for those for whom it was a business practice, it was also an expression of a faith that deemed African Americans inferior. So if that’s your idea of freedom, hiding behind an anachronistic belief in a premise, that boils down to, “I think you’re icky, because you’re not like me,”by all means move to Tehran. When I walk into a business, that purveyor’s sexuality is not on my mind, when I hold open a door, give way to another car or simple smile at another person as I wait in line for coffee, I am not picturing their night of hot sweaty sex. Why? Because I don’t care. It astounds me no end that in the 21st century we would seek to exclude anyone from the American experience. How can we purport to be the world’s shining example of democracy and fairness when we can’t even guarantee the self-determination of every one of our citizens. Sadly for you those who’ve been “defrocked” by the gay community are anecdotal at best. If conservatives, for once, lived the courage of their convictions, by letting live and let live, they would see fair less scorched earth tactics from the gay community. They did not choose this battle, you did.

        • Chip70

          Ouch – Richard… Mark here has slammed you down. I’d rather read an article by Mark – that Matt.

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          If I were to tell the press millions of Americans would be blown up by an Iranian nut job or that Democrats have stolen your entire life savings with bailouts and Obamacare, nobody panics because it is all part of the plan…

          But if I say a few homosexuals in Hollywood are upset over their little wee wees, why, everyone just loses their minds!

          Sincerely,

          A. Joker

        • mmercier0921

          I have gay friends and coworkers. In the last fifty years, I have never seen an example of discrimination. Not one.

          No one cares, get over it.

          This last few years, I have seen several prominent and not so prominent people destroyed for opening their mouths and expressing personal beliefe.

          Some care.

          • Jeff_Selbst

            You’ve never seen an example of discrimination. Wow. I wonder if your “gay friends” (I doubt you really have any) would agree with your smug, fatuous remarks.

        • americanlatina11

          You say “if you do not like homosexual marriage do not have one” bit you really want to force people to be in one or lose their ability to have a job or a business. Intolerant bigots.

      • mmercier0921

        Paul Kersey. Death wish.

      • Ben

        “Nice little lie…tell it to the bakers and photographers now out of business just for exercising their 1st Amendment rights.”

        All of those cases involved anti-discrimination laws, not same-sex marriage you idiot.

        • americanlatina11

          No, those laws are used as anti religious hammers to smash religious freedom.

        • Ricard

          This is called ‘a distinction without a difference,’ as ‘same sex marriage’ canard was the assertion for ‘anti-discrimination.’ Are you seriously telling me that photographers who do not want to be part of a gay wedding on religious grounds, and can all of a sudden have their 1st Amendment right sued away, “won’t suffer one iota as a result?” Please…

    • Brad Harvey

      It’s not that gay rights will lose, it’s that they don’t seem to realize that it is impossible for them to actually win. No matter how many states legalize same-sex ‘marriage’, it will never be anything more than a government sanctioned domestic partnership. No matter how many times the government sanctioned domestic partnership is physically consummated, what issues from that act will never result in the conception of genetic continuation. No matter how skilled the surgeon, a man will never get up from the operating table a female, only a castrated male. On the other hand, those opposing it will never win all they want either. If you love someone, you love someone. No amount of legislation and constitutional tinkering will ever change that. Were both segments of the population to simply come to terms with these irrefutable facts and concentrate on the pursuit of obtaining legal equality for themselves and their partners, placing them on the same tier as opposite sex couples in regards to financial rights, adoptions, insurance, property ownership, paying taxes, etc, moving on might actually happen. Lastly, were this government sanctioned domestic partnership to ever arrive at an irreconcilable crossroads, it should be just as big a pain in the neck to dissolve it as it is for traditional marriages.

    • mmercier0921

      Fags have always been tolerated.

      Stuff this in peoples face hard enough, and reality and bigotry will reassert in most shocking manner.

      Despite the Mary poppins indoctrination of a generation…

      Humans are still human, they react in very predictable manner.

    • Allan Theobald

      Sorry they have all ready lost because the vast vast majority of gay couples don’t really want to be married. And for those that do marry the result is going to be a disaster for the majority since gay couples are statistically very unlikely to stay together long term. Soon enough it will be clear that the exercise wasn’t about something they really wanted but rather the politics and marxist ideology of the gay activists.

      • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

        The U.S. State Dept. has been infested with communists since WW1 and Woodrow Wilson, they tried to steal the Russian elections for their comrades in the Russian Communist Party through non-profit n.g.o.s… just like at home in America… But Vladimir Putin beat them… so they launched a fággot jihad against the Russian Orthodox church over the the punk rock band and the Olympics (something Romney also piled onto).

        When Marine Le Pen can face criminal prosecution (in France of all places) for criticizing Islam in context with existing French laws, there is something rotten.

        Francois Hollande is a Sodom Hussein Obama sycophant… they are both lawn jockeys for the Jewish globalist financiers flooding Europe with the Muslims who are just witless pawns of their “destabilization” policies all across Europe, the Middle East and the Americas.

        • Jeff_Selbst

          I apologize. I thought you were just an anti-Semite, but now I see you’re clinically insane and can’t help your ravings.

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            Arabs are also semites… you insane religious fággot…

          • WinstonBlakeLULZ

            he’s so classy too!

        • WinstonBlakeLULZ

          hahahaha I can’t even…

    • Miranda Nelson

      If you’ve already won then why are you still fighting.

      • Mark Hales

        Read some of the comments in this discussion Miranda. The win for Gay Rights is eventual, because as has been stated by several judges, there is no rational basis for denying marriage rights. That said, the attitudes of Winston Blake, mmercier0921 and others is still pervasive in statehouse, churches, and in the halls of congress.

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Gehen sie saugen eine Schrotflinte…

          • WinstonBlakeLULZ

            I cast you out!

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            ……..

          • Pax Humana

            This will be your view of things if you decide to mess with me, Winston Blake, and ditto for anyone else that is on Disqus, MSN, Newsvine, Yahoo, YouTube, or Facebook that has an axe to grind with me in their lives.

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            You ecclesiastic gaytheists and fagnostics would have men believe they will receive condign punishment for their contumacy of monogamy, as opposed to the freedom of the polygamy found in nature, which is inherently pagan and heterosexual… all men are born of a woman…

        • Alleena

          That’s what they said about abortion many years ago, and we are still fighting that issue. The people should rule, not judges.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            Not the same. What is the same is interracial marriage. Exact same kinds of arguments, including that the couples were degenerates looking for attention, bible verses, and concerns about children. And that is a settled issue.

      • TrollBaby

        Because we want to utterly destroy bigots like yourself.

        • Alleena

          All you do is insult. Check the Center for Disease Control’s site. See what they say about sodomy. You are promoting extremely unhealthy behavior.

          • TrollBaby

            The fact that you think sodomy defines the LGBT community only shows how insulting you are, but by all means please proceed bigot.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            It is very very important that graphic images of gay sex are kept front and center in any bigoted conversation about gays. Without it, even bigots can’t work up enough energy to care.

        • americanlatina11

          Your anti religious bigotry is also unconstitutuional.

          • TrollBaby

            The constitution protects you from government persecution against your religion. We the people are free to destroy you bigots as we wish.

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        Mop-up operations.

    • Alleena

      Yes, the world will suffer. The one who is having a hissy fit is you. You want to rearrange society to fit the needs of a small minority. It is always about you, your needs, and how we all have to do things your way. The central idea is me, me, and more me. Anyone who doesn’t agree not too bright. But you have stretched the limits of the rest of us, and the whole trail of lies is starting to be uncovered. Things won’t change in a few years, but you will lose.

    • Pax Humana

      “Gay rights” WILL lose because human history has shown that EVERY single society that had embraced this way of thought as a “normal way of life” (when, in is, ironically enough, a way of death) has either been destroyed or that it is currently on the road to destruction..EVERY SINGLE TIME WITHOUT FAILURE, Mark Hales!

      • Mark Hales

        Got anything even remotely resembling facts to back up your rant Pax?

        • Mark Hales

          Oh Pax, I just read the Gay Manifesto from 1987, that was your response to my two week old request for evidence. What a pathetic dupe you are. Any person of reasonable intelligence, excluding you of course, would have seen the satire of that piece. Stay in your basement, the world has no need of your services.

  • Katie Bukata

    I’m sorry, but let’s take a second to think about something. If the purpose of marriage is for reproduction, and those who CAN’T physically reproduce (homosexual couples) shouldn’t be allowed to get married, doesn’t it follow that barren/sterile couples shouldn’t be allowed to get married either? What about those who CHOOSE not to reproduce? By the logic of this argument, all of those people should just have civil unions.

    • Faceless Commenter

      And what about post-menopausal women? They should be banned from marrying, too.

      • mmercier0921

        Reach a little higher, that branch is just a bit above your intellectual grasp.

    • Shay

      Because marriage wasn’t just about reproduction. It was also about protecting women. But the feminists robbed us of that. Now women have to slave for the corporations to earn a buck, just like men do. This system is all peachy as long as times are good – we’re living in a Western world with all the comforts and few have to labor with their backs and hands as we used to for thousands of years. Liberal ideology only lasts as long as the lights stay on and they cannot imagine a world that isn’t like the one they were born into. Everything will stay easy and we’ll always have plenty to eat. They believe this because this is all that *they* have known.

      • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

        The praeterpolitical power of the churches to institute monogamy as an ecclesiastic rule of law enabled them to determine the legitimacy of the succession of the pagan kings, abrogate the natural rights to property and self-defense, as well as gave them power of ecclesiastic censure for divorce.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      These ecclesiastic gaytheists and fagnostics would have men believe they will receive condign punishment for their contumacy of monogamy, as opposed to the freedom of the polygamy found in nature, which is inherently pagan and heterosexual… all men are born of a woman…

      Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one man and one woman…

      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        Had to drop that one more time didn’t ya? Picard is much disappoint

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one man and one woman…

    • mmercier0921

      The ultimate goal is to use state cohersion to force Christian churches to grant marrige sanction to homosexuals.

      These people are simply marxist reprobates.

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        Why? What’s that worth? We still don’t force churches to marry interracial couples. Why is this different?

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          All men are born of a woman.

          Monogamy is a hackneyed tenet of religion.

  • Faceless Commenter

    The column was great while it was about free speech — then Matt had to start arguing the merits of gay marriage itself and ruined it.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      “And oftentimes, to win us to our harm,
      The instruments of darkness tell us truths,
      Win us with honest trifles, to betray ’s
      In deepest consequence.”

      (Banquo in Macbeth)

  • The Voice of Reason

    *watches the ball fly out of the park*

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      “Against the use of nature? Present fearsAre less than horrible imaginings.
      My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical,
      Shakes so my single state of man
      That function is smothered in surmise,
      And nothing is but what is not.”

      Macbeth

      • The Voice of Reason

        ….and knowing is half the battle!

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Taking sides in the conflicts between devils is not the path to Salvation.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ

          • The Voice of Reason

            I honestly have no clue what you’re talking about. Could you perhaps speak plain?

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            You think darkness is your ally? You merely adopted the dark, I was born in it, molded by it… I didn’t see the light of day until I was already a man… by then, to me, it was blinding…

            There is no light without the dark… all things come from the dark and all things return to it… the dark is the only thing that exists independent of all else in the universe…

            “In all chaos there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order.”

            ― C.G. Jung

          • WinstonBlakeLULZ

            no one does…

  • Vox_Clams

    Great column with lots of great points.

    Let’s get this out of the way, I have supported gay marriage long before Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and the rest of the lemmings in the Democratic party did. Way back when, I thought that civil unions were the way to go, and I hoped, without much optimism, that the civil union movement might help people understand the difference between the legal concept of “marriage” and the love relationship/commitment/sacrament of marriage. However, around the time the Democrats were voting for and signing the Defense of Marriage Act, I realized that the semantics mattered too much to gay couples and that they had a point, the same word should be used to describe the legal status of all hitched couples, so gay marriage it was.

    However, if it comes to free speech, or in the case of Eich, free thought, my dedication to fundamental liberty trumps my concern over what word is used to describe the joinder of gay couples under the law.

    In other words, if I have to choose between supporting gay marriage and supporting individual liberty, I will go with liberty every time.

    p.s. Written on Google Chrome.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      The Jewish globalist financiers funding Sodom Hussein Obama, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Salafist terror groups opposing Assad in Syria want control just like they wanted Libyan oil for the EUSSR… they just tried the same thing in Ukraine and lost again…

      Talmudic Jew terrorists have hijacked the U.S. surveillance police state, their puppets like McKeating Five McCain and Sodom Hussein Obama are so obvious, they are bought and paid for by Jewish globalist financiers like George Soros and Goldman Sachs…

      The so-called “conservative” and “liberal” media is a huge fake, it is lipstick on a kosher pig… notice the knee jerk Jew puppets crying about Russia, but who leave the US borders wide open…

      Tikkun Olam paganism and Judaic word fetishism coming from linguists like Naom Chomsky over at M.I.T. use the Talmud and Zohar as a blueprint for an illusion of a parallel and false reality.

      Like the Jew who dry humps the Wailing Wall like Miley Cyrus trying to achieve an erotic union with their “Shekinah,” a masturbatory cosmos maker… or miss neo-kabbalah Madonna, “Like a Virgin”…

    • TrollBaby

      Lol, please explain who stopped Eich from being a bigot? Freedom of speech or thought doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. You have every right to stand up for what you believe, but that doesn’t mean your employer has to tolerate it. Seriously, get a clue.

      • Vox_Clams

        Should employers fire Muslims who believe in stoning gays to death, forced marriage, the destruction of Israel, etc. (good summary found here: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/375098/cairs-jihad-against-honor-diaries-andrew-c-mccarthy/page/0/2)?

        Oh, and how many Democrats did you vote against because they voted for the DOMA? As a voter, you are only vote, but a vote against them is a vote to fire them.

        Just curious – not leading questions.

        • TrollBaby

          Employers are entitled to fire any person as long as the reasoning doesn’t violate a person’s rights under the law. An employer cannot refuse to hire someone because they are muslim, but if a persons public religious activities damage your business you have every right to fire them. So, for example if you run a bridal shop, and one of your employees consistently posts to facebook about stoning women, you would be well within your rights to fire said employee if they refused to stop their activities since their is a rational harm being done to your business which relies on attracting women. Private businesses are not required to tolerate your public activities.

          This has nothing to do with democrats or DOMA. It has to with a guy who lost his job for being an unrepentant bigot, which was viewed by his employer as bad for business. The corporation had every right to fire him. But not to worry, I’m sure Hobby Lobby or Chick Fil A has a job for him.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            This.

          • Vox_Clams

            I would suggest a different approach that lets the free marketplace of ideas triumph. Rather than outing someone for giving to IIIT, to use my example (IIIT is a Muslim group that supports executing gays), and then firing them (provided you can prove a business interest), see what happens when someone who holds such views, whether through ignorance, brainwashing or actual faith, is exposed to more reasonable ideas. What happens when my IIIT supporter works with gays, Jews and professional women? Conversely, what happens when you fire him to attempt to shut him up?

            The gay marriage movement is a perfect example of the positive power of the free marketplace of ideas. In 1996, DOMA passed 85-14 in the Senate and 342-67 in the House. Bill Clinton signed it into law, with no veto threatened or exercised. According to Pew, around that time, only 27% of Americans supported gay marriage. In 2003, when Pew first started asking about gay marriage and civil unions, 45% supported civil unions while only 38% supported same-sex marriage. In 2008, Prop 8 passed, in California, with 52% of the vote, not too far from the 2009 Pew survey showing 53% of all Americans opposed to gay marriage.

            Fast forward to May 2013, when for the first time a majority of Americans favored gay marriage.

            What changed over the last two decades? A huge increase in the number of people who now know gay people. http://www.people-press.org/2013/06/06/in-gay-marriage-debate-both-supporters-and-opponents-see-legal-recognition-as-inevitable/

            The free marketplace of ideas works a whole lot better than “shut up and conform, and conform now, or we will declare you a non-person, make your political contributions public and get your fired from your job.”

          • TrollBaby

            So what if your boss was an unrepentant racist that made donations to the KKK, would we expect employees to just accept this fact? Moreover, if your coworker was posting racist comments on his public facebook account would we expect an employer to tolerate this activity? Eich didn’t just hold anti gay views, he actively supported the creation of laws that took away rights that had been granted to the LGBT community in a very public fashion. If Eich was just a normal employee his advocay might not have mattered, but as a manager he should have known better than to do what he did. A business is not a townhall where people can say anything or do anything they want and expect no consequences. This is where your argument fails. If you want a business where people can engage in this type of activity then create it.

          • Vox_Clams

            Have not heard much from the KKK lately. Although the Democrats who supported the KKK instituted some horrifically big government for about 100 years, the free marketplace of ideas crushed the KKK many years ago, without any help from the Thought Police. The KKK were always a minority who used bullying tactics – similar to the Eich firing – to intimidate the majority who opposed their totalitarian ways.

            Although I have no idea if Eich went to confession for his alleged sins (he never posted on FB or used his position to promote his thoughts; rather he made a political contribution that got publicized by others), he did “repent” (http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2014/04/04/brandon-eich-and-hillary-clinton/) – it is just that he was not offered forgiveness (absolution) by the high church of the totalitarians who decided that he needed to be declared a non-person, now and forever.

          • TrollBaby

            Again, this has nothing to do with democrats or big government….please try to focus! This has to do with the right of an employer to employ whoever he/she wants within the bounds of the law. Moreover, you should take a history lesson the KKK was not a fringe group and was widely supported by southern whites until blacks stood up and fought for their rights. To try and compare the violence and destruction of the KKK to the protest actions of Gay rights supporters is ridiculous. No one is stopping you or Eich from being a bigot. You are free to think and say what you want. Your issue is that you are upset that there are consequences for your speech.

          • Vox_Clams

            Actually, it has everything to do with big government – totalitarianism style – supported by today’s leading Democrats (many of whom are now openly against free speech) and way too many Republicans. This also has even more to do with the hypocrisy of an incredible number of Democrats who have shown no interest whatsoever in shunning Hilary Clinton, and other prominent Democrats, for their very public and oft-repeated remarks that had a far greater impact on the gay marriage issue than a single $1k contribution from private citizen Eich.

            As for the KKK, they wore hoods for a reason. They were criminals. They intimidated. They shunned people. They scared people, especially from speaking their minds. That was the point of their terrorist tactics. Their number one enemy was free speech. And they used fear and intimidation because logic and reason were not on their side.

            Those who want to silence Eich are using the same bullying tactics as the KKK – metaphorically burning crosses on the lawns of those who dare to disagree with them. They are going so far as to call for criminal penalties for thought crimes. Let us hope and pray that they do not go as far as lynchings.

            Wait until the tyrannical mob starts holding a view contrary to yours. A mere ten years ago, my view was in the minority. I suppose an employer then might have interpreted my support for gay marriage as bad for business. Good thing none of my employers ever asked about my political views, voting record or political contributions.

            Fortunately, I now am my own boss, but were I to be employed by someone else, it would scare the bejesus out of me if I thought that my employer cared about my political views, political contributions (which I no longer make because I am afraid of retaliation – by Democrats) or voting record – all of which would definitely be misinterpreted by someone not fully informed on the reasons for my views, contributions and votes.

            Supporting free speech and liberty does not equate with bigotry.

            Opposing free speech and liberty, on the other hand, pretty much by definition is bigotry.

          • TrollBaby

            Please explain which government official stopped someone from exercising their right to free speech? The Constitution only protects government prohibitions on speech. It does not protect you from the consequences of your speech in the public sphere. What you are advocating for is not free speech, it’s freedom from consequences and the responsibilities that go along with exercising the right to speak freely. When you exercise your right to speak, others also have the right to challenge your speech, if you cannot defend your position against public criticism, the problem is not with said criticism, but with the fallacy of your argument. I suggest you suck it up and deal with it champ.

          • Pax Humana

            Homosexuality is heterophobia and it is also bigotry and hate speech. Clearly one who is as educated would have seen this as the truth by now, am I right? Finally, do you not have a bridge to go under or a cave to go back into, Trollbaby?

          • TrollBaby

            Try to catch up buttercup.

      • americanlatina11

        Tolerance means tolerating what you do not like.

        The beauty of America is the opportunity to hear things with which you disagree.

        • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

          Now why is it that I agree with your statement yet suspect that I don’t agree with you? Probably because right-wingers are psychopaths–they’ve learned the right things to say by watching others: “Grandma’s dead. And everyone’s crying. I should probably cry….”

          • TrollBaby

            Never agree with a conservative. By their logic an employer would have to tolerate a racist employee’s public comments, which everyone would find patently ridiculous. Tolerance doesn’t mean tolerating discrimination. You are free to believe whatever you want, but no, we don’t have to tolerate your views when they lead to the denial of rights and discrimination against others.

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            The EUSSR cannot field an army because once they arm the white majority, we will turn on the crowned heads of Europe.

            This is why the European Union has been on US military welfare since WW2.

            White Supremacy movements are growing exponentially all over Europe, we won’t lose this time, ásshole…

        • TrollBaby

          The beauty of america is that the public holds people accountable for their views rather than the government. No one stopped Eich from being a bigot, just like no one can stop other people from getting him fired for his disgusting bigotry. You are free to be a bigot, that doesn’t entitle you to employment.

          • marylamb72

            So I guess the “war” has changed and we need to change? Left wingers put out of business anyone who disagrees with them so I guess we need to get more aggressive. Protest, boycott sue and pickett any we disagree with. Put them out of business any way we can JUST because we disagree? THAT is the way of the radical left wing. Fight fire with fire, I guess? If WE disagree we get to FIRE them? Not entitled to employment, Does that go BOTH ways?

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            Jihad works both ways…

            They must think they will have fun playing “spread the other cheek” with their new Islamic masters.

            It’s a fággot jihad.

          • TrollBaby

            Since it’s still legal for conservative bigots to fire people for being gay in the majority of states, your comment falls on deaf ears. Quite honestly you people can do what you feel you must, but the majority of people are with us so by all means please continue to marginalize yourself. We will continue to fight your disgusting bigotry and get you fired!

      • Family Love

        So you advocate an America where employers fire people for their political and religious views?

        • TrollBaby

          I’m not advocating for anything. America is a place where you can be fired for being gay in a majority of states, is that ok? Having political views are not a constitutionally protected class, so yes you can be fired for your public political activities when they negatively impact your employer. A person cannot be fired for their religious beliefs, but you can be fired when your public religious activities have a negative impact on your employer. You don’t have a constitutional right to be emoloyed. What people like you need to understand is that your right to speech comes with consequences so you should probably think about using it wisely.

          • Family Love

            What you’re advocating – employment based on personal and political views as well as “two wrongs make a right” is about as short-sighted and sad of a philosophy as I’ve heard in a long while. It isn’t right to fire gays based on their views/personal beliefs and if you support this agenda and it successfully stands, you will bring back the justification to fire gays based on their “negative impact” on their employer as well. Even famous reputable liberals and gays are calling this episode with Eich very wrong. It should be obvious why Mozilla screwed up. I switched to Google Chrome.

          • TrollBaby

            So should an employer that runs a bridal shop have to accept the activities of an employee that posts on facebook about stoning women? What about an employer that runs a business that has a high minority consumer base, should the employer be forced to employ a person that makes racist comments on the job? In both cases most reasonable people would say no. Eich actively supported an effort to take rights away from gay people that the state of CA has already granted gays. This goes much farther than just firing a person for what they believe. Eich was an active participant in the effort to take rights away from citizens! Mozilla had every right to fire him for his activities which werebad for business. What’s really sad is that you have the nerve to get upset about Eich being fired, but what have you ever done about the fact that gays are STILL being fired for who they are? Have you ever written your congressman? As such, you complaints about a bigot getting fired for his active participation in promoting bigotry fall on deaf ears.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            What TrollBaby said. “Eich was an active participant in the effort to take rights away from citizens!” I would add that one of the things being missed here is Eich was not just any employee. He didn’t work the Mozilla assembly line. He was at the top and would have been a major face of the company. Failing to make that distinction leads to a lot of hand-wringing about secretaries losing their jobs that I think is unfounded.

    • marylamb72

      Correct me if I’m wrong Vox but from what you wrote I got the impression that you were denouncing what was done to Eich.

  • Esoteric

    Great article! Your definition of marriage and it’s purpose is right on point. And yes, they did create a thousand that are willing to take action. Very perceptive.

  • JJJ PPP

    Dear David Rufful,

    You lost.
    And will lose again.
    Get used to justice and human rights.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      Against the use of nature? Present fearsAre less than horrible imaginings.
      My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical,
      Shakes so my single state of man
      That function is smothered in surmise,
      And nothing is but what is not.

      (Macbeth)

      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        your quotes are so insightful! not to mention relevant…

    • Frank Keen

      That’s What You Think ASSHOLE,……Human Right My Ass,….Once We Take That Senate Back We Are Going To Start Kicking Ass And Taking Names,….Justice My Ass,….Sickness,……Filth……Scum…..And You Better Stop Going After People And Throwing Shit At Them Or You Are Going To Get Your FAGGOT Ass kicked soon….Just Try Us….Faggot

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        So much anger. So much beautiful anger. Your bitter tears will make an excellent martini. He’s right, you are losing at every turn. But really–it’s for the best. Your kind will still be bitching from the trash bin of history when gay marriage is no more controversial than public breastfeeding. Thanks for the laughs.

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          You’re like the Jew who dry humps the Wailing Wall like Miley Cyrus trying to achieve an erotic union with their “Shekinah,” a masturbatory cosmos maker… or miss neo-kabbalah Madonna, “Like a Virgin”…

          You people just can’t stop playing with your dícks… you think that if you tattoo an “M” on both cheeks of your áss you will have a baby because it spells “mom” when you bend over.

  • guest

    Excellent!

  • mmercier0921

    Truth is indeed painful to the corrupt.

    • Jeff_Selbst

      Yes, it is. And this article (and your comment) show the sad consequences of moral corruption.

  • Realist

    There are four main groups of “playas” in this psychodrama created by the libcult:

    1) The aggressive, tyrranical, power-hungry narcissists who are the rabble-rousers (otherwise known as “community” organizers) and they make up the majority of the truly nasty, aggressive politicians who seek out conflict for their own personal benefit,

    2) The decieved and inculcated shlubs who have been convinced by libcult media infotainment machine that they are indeed the problem and they must divorce themselves from their history, culture, language, heritage, wealth and control over their own lives in order to satisfy the insatiable demands and hunger for power of the libcultists who assure us that they alone know best in ALL things.

    3) The silent majority who have been browbeaten and demeaned by the libcult media infotainment machine and who prefer to just keep quiet for fear of being singled out and targeted for personal destruction (Alinskyed) by libcult accolytes.

    4) Those who know the libcultists for who and what they are and will not slink away and allow the aggressive nasty cultists to stomp their feet and scream red-faced insults and win the day. This group will grow rapidly as the realities of Obaemsiahcare affect them personally, which is why Obamesiah The One is illegally and unconstitutionally rewriting that “law of the land” daily as best suits the needs of the democRAT cultists.

    The libcult will have to be forcefully stopped, dismantled piece by piece and those who engaged in criminal activity to aid and abet the cult put on PUBLIC trial for their crimes. Only then will you have the genuine possibility of overthrowing the growing threat of those POLITICAL CRIMINALS whose unquestioned and unexamined alliegence is FIRST AND FORMOST TO THE LIBCULT.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      Tikkun Olam paganism and Judaic word fetishism coming from linguists like Naom Chomsky over at M.I.T. use the Talmud and Zohar as a blueprint for an illusion of a parallel and false reality.

      Like the Jew who dry humps the Wailing Wall like Miley Cyrus trying to achieve an erotic union with their “Shekinah,” a masturbatory cosmos maker… or miss neo-kabbalah Madonna, “Like a Virgin”…

      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        ummmmmmm…

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Ich bin der Orden des Drachen, Schwanzlutcher jude…

      • Pax Humana

        You, sir, are a New World Order and Illuminati serving historical revisionist, disinformation/diversion/distraction/double agent, shill, and troll, Winston Blake. I will also say this to you and to dale71, Gehenna, Rob McCune, Kevin R. Cross, and any other idiots that are on here today. You are welcome the rest of you that ARE actually sane in this room.

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Gehen sie saugen eine Schrotflinte…

  • David Shafer

    Best satire piece ever. Excellent!

    • Alleena

      You are simply a troll. You come here insult and say nothing. If you think that makes people believe in your cause, you are very mistaken.

      • Alex Smith

        David’s right. Surely you and your beloved Bible-thumping pals have heard of Brown v. Board of Education? Because I would imagine any true conservative would condemn Plessy v. Ferguson as a fundamental violation of Constitutional rights, but it sounds to me like you love segregation. God forbid some faggots love each other and marry just like you can do.

        Do you know what people did against Mozilla? We practiced good old-fashioned capitalism. In the year 2014, most of us proudly welcome people to freely express themselves. Sure, Mozilla can do whatever they want. But we also can practice consumerism, and choose companies like Google and Microsoft (who have stellar records in human equality) instead.

        I love capitalism, don’t you?

        Oh yeah, and how about those courts striking down your precious marriage definitions left and right? Have fun being the new minority. Neoconservatives will fail just like the KKK and the Nazis. Every time you have to find someone else to hate — and every time you fail miserably.

        So go on. Keep bitching about the evolution of human rights. But last I checked, slavery is illegal, blacks can marry whites, and women can vote.

        Have fun out there, champ.

      • <3Trolls

        that’s why his “trolling” got 11 up-votes… good thing your insightful rebuttal blew that out of the water with 7… wait…

  • Megan Fauci

    Honestly, the whole argument is a waste of time. Why fight, on either side, for something as out dated and flawed as the institution of marriage? If we got rid of marriage altogether there would be no issue. If your religion tells you that homosexuality is wrong, then do what you got to do to not be gay. I’m an atheist and I’ve allowed those of faith to come and pray with me at my door. I won’t debase people for believing what they want. I will however politely disagree and ask that you do not lump all liberal minded people into the same category.

    • Alleena

      You are very, very confused. The institution of marriage is the cornerstone of our society. Take away marriage and the society slowly crumbles. Do your homework! People from traditional families are the ones who anchor society while the “progressives” play.

      • Mark Hales

        Alleena, while many in this discussion assumed that because I support Gay Marriage I must be gay, I’m not. I’m a married father of three children. My relationship with my wife Pam is as healthy today as it was 12 years ago when we walked down the aisle. If a gay marriage happens in Iowa, does a divorce happen in Alabama? Of course not, we are all responsible for the choices we make in our own lives. Nobody is taking away marriage, the argument that allowing gays to marry will erode marriage as a religious sacrament is ridiculous. Churches will still marry people. When the cities, counties, states, etc, incorporated the word marriage into civil statutes for the union of two people, the institution ceased to be the sole purview of religion. Society will be fine.

  • TrollBaby

    Lol, more conservative bs. This has nothing to do with “free speech”. Why do conservatives always try to misinform people? The Constitution only protects government prohibitions on speech. You have no right to free speech in the context of your employment with a private company. Eich was completely free to be a bigot, and others are completely free to call out his bigotry and call for his resignation. Freedom doesn’t mean freedom from the consequences of your actions. If you feel being a bigot is a good Idea then maybe you should work for hobby Lobby or chick fil a.

  • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

    “‘Advancements’ earned through tyranny never endure.” America was built on the tyranny of slavery and it has endured. Done quite well, actually. Tyranny is, by definition, always wrong, but it most certainly can endure. And that’s historical fact. Just saying.

    As for Eich, this seems a bit much: “So, you’ve tracked another dissident and skinned him alive. You’ve made an example of Brendan Eich, and now you dance joyously around his disemboweled carcass.” Pretty dramatic for a millionaire who, through public pressure, was forced to resign his job because his presence threatened to cost his company money. Was he beaten, tortured, or killed and I just didn’t hear about it? How will you top that description when someone is actually physically harmed?

    Finally, I love your post. Because every single day your side is losing. Who would have imagined that, what, 12-13 additional states would come into the gay marriage fold? “Utah, Matt, Utah! You’re losing in in both the legal courts and the court of public opinion.Those are the only places that matter. Even State Attorney Generals, in places like Kentucky and Virginia, are refusing to waste their time defending unconstitutional bigotry. And oddly enough, the world hasn’t come to an end yet and my straight marriage is still intact. So I love that you pretend that “The South Will Rise Again!”, so to speak. It’s loser talk and it makes me so so happy! Please post more hysterical ranting. I’ll do my part in your anti-gay crusade by reading it. Great stuff.

    • Mark Hales

      Brilliant Chris!

    • snafubar

      If you think Mozilla would have suffered financially by keeping Eich, just wait and see the magnitude of the financial repercussions for forcing him to resign.

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        We’re shaking all over.

        • snafubar

          Oh, you work at Mozilla?

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            No. But I use Mozilla. And I stand with them. The “we” here are those of us who believe that we have as much right to throw our political weight around as you do. No one jailed or beat up Eich. No one firebombed his house. No one burned a cross on his lawn or seized his bank accounts or followed his kids home from school. Get over yourselves. Stop playing victim because you’re losing the power to victimize. It’s pathetic.

    • americanlatina11

      Utah by force of one person wearing a pagan robe.

      Yes your anti religious bigotry is unconstitutional.

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        I’ll bet if the guy wearing the pagan robe had sided with you, you’d have burned a yule log in his honor…

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          judaic bolshevist mammonism (baphomet) = mahomet (muslim brotherhood)

          same devil…

    • Bolshevism Lives

      America was not built on the tyranny of slavery. That’s obscenely stupid on its face. Just because the Marxist Black Caucus and their friends and mentors say so incessantly doesn’t make it true. Slavery, like socialism itself, was a foreign problem, foisted on us by predatory haters from Europe and North Africa, one that we eventually solved in our fashion and overcame (no thanks to socialist sympathizers like Lincoln), at least until the race-baiters and power-mongers peddling last century’s failed European ideologies created this contemporary illusion that it’s still an issue.

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        Can you flesh out your argument for me? How was slavery both “a foreign problem” and “foisted on us”? Did we have it or not? Was it valuable or not? Many prominent early leaders–Founding Fathers and others–thought it was indispensable to the success of America. Tell me, do you take responsibility for anything in your own life, or do you just blame it all on ”
        foreigners”?

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          Islamic countries execute homosexuals by stoning them to death and the Koran permits a man to have four wives.

          Broken clocks can be right twice a day.

          If the Iranians nuke Israel, the Palestinian filth also dies in the fallout… win/win situation

  • Ben

    “You want to be free to love? You are. You always have been.”

    So those 3 decades Republicans spent trying to keep sodomy laws on the books just don’t exist then? Ok then.

    • snafubar

      I guess gay parades in buttless chaps and in-your-face militant homosexuality make up for all the years of closet living.

      • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

        No, they don’t. They don’t even begin to make up for it. But I imagine equality will do nicely.

        • snafubar

          Then practice what you preach. Every argument about equality from the LGBT “community” includes their right to stick their agenda in every one else’s face, while ridiculing religious and family organizations and beliefs. You argument isn’t about promoting equality, it’s about promoting buggery.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            I know, I know–it wouldn’t be a “fight” if gays would just stop fighting back. Meanies!

          • snafubar

            Fighting for your rights doesn’t mean ridiculing or taking away someone else’s. LGBT commandments in public schools? No problem. Ten Commandments? No way. Unfortunately for you and your cause, you do not see the hypocrisy of your own position. Much like the warming alarmists, you want the discussion to be one sided, and “settled”. What you fail to realize is that as your destructive objectives become more self-evident, the public will turn against your gang-style tactics.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            The Ten Commandments have no place in public schools, save literature class. Read the Constitution and the writings of the Founders. Schools are supposed to be secular. Do you want your kid reading the Koran in school? I sure don’t.

            And the public is on our side–it has turned on you and yours in spectacular fashion. But I love your “They can’t keep dishing out this kind of punishment forever!” bravado!

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

            The Ten Commandments are from the Jewish religion.

            Satanism is also a Jewish cult.

        • Peter Gibson

          You call what happened to Brendan Eich equality? You call the hard core intimidation tactics and the numerous cases of vandalism and death threats to countless Christian groups AND Prop 8 supporters equality? You call ostracizing anyone who doesn’t absolutely acquiesce to YOUR version of a moral code, with total and unconditional surrender, equality?

          Sorry. You lot have lost the plot. Enjoy the worm that’s poised now to turn on you, because you’re effectively marginalizing yourselves, sans the need for a single imbecilic Homophobic mob.

          You’ve become that which you most despise, and so many of us are just now coming to see that.

          Believe me, many more Americans, even those of us who have stood arm in arm with you in the past – even to our own personal and social detriment – we will think twice before offering any sort of support to causes you have a vested interest in. In this series of tragic and colossally short-sighted assaults on the rights of others, you’ve left a sickening stain on the flags of tolerance so many have proudly waved on your behalf.

          Congratulations, your lot of militant “fight back” nonsense has more than likely set the sincerity and relevancy of LGBT communities back decades. What’s really tragic is you’re taking so many good people down with you.

          Well done.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            ROFL! “You call ostracizing anyone who doesn’t absolutely acquiesce to YOUR version of a moral code, with total and unconditional surrender, equality?” Right back atcha! Tell us, Peter, when was it that you “stood arm in arm” with gays in the past? What year? What was the final straw for you? What are the hardcore intimidation tactics? We need examples, man!

          • Peter Gibson

            1998: Nova Scotia, Canada (near a reputable University): I took a beating that landed me in a hospital for standing up to a group of drooling idiots hassling my extremely gay (and soon to be) brother in law. He was sitting at an adjacent table in a pub when a bottle of Schooner beer came flying at him, along with a crapload of insults and puffed up, homophobic ego.

            I was in rehab for nearly four months from that encounter, for a broken shoulder. I also suffered a liver contusion and pulped most of the bones in my left hand, from making damned sure that at least one of those neanderthal idiots ended up in worse condition than me.

            Since I need my left hand for work it also cost me 5 months of being unemployed.

            ROFL some more now you insolent twit, because I’m exactly the kind of person your silly infantile attitude is alienating.

            You know what? I’d stand up for anyone being bullied today, which is why I bothered to engage your silly post. I happen to have a moral standard that compels me to be repulsed by bigots of all types, including imbeciles and militant lunatics just like you. And that has nothing to do with your sexual preference.

            Other than that, I’m extremely familiar with discrimination and bigotry because I was born as black as the day is long. I’ve seen what your disgusting brand of hateful malignancy can do to harm good people. And so has my Singaporean wife. No need for me to recount the many stories my wife and I could tell, but needless to say, you will NEVER know what it’s like when discrimination is unavoidable and life threatening. You can turn off the Gay beacon when necessary, you self aggrandizing, tiny little man. I can’t turn White to save my life, nor can my wife.

            Your a tourist when it comes to the subject matter of true bigotry and inequality bro. A silly, puffed up, juvenile, pedestrian.

            So ya, take that for what it’s worth or dismiss it with Millennial text abbreviations and ROFLMAO happy crap. I couldn’t possibly care less. You’ve already proven your task here is to be a miserable and worthless instigator.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            First, let me address your post: I’m glad you stood up for your brother in law. That was the right thing to do. Stand up for him now. Don’t co-sign discriminatory right-wing crap like you’re doing here by pretending that some bigot losing his job through public condemnation leading to a private business decision is some kind of lynching. That’s what this post is claiming and it is B.S. Did Eich get beat up, like you did? No. Is he in physical rehab, like you were? No. Will his resignation cost him like your 5 months off cost you? No. So what do you say we don’t put him up on a cross? And who kicked your ass? The same kind of hysterical bigots that you are riding with on the blog today. I stand up to bullies, too–even black ones. How far you’ve fallen, sir.

            As for your ridiculous “gay beacon” trash–tell me, black man, if you could “turn off” your “black beacon”, would you? Do you lie awake at night wishing you could be like the damn gays and keep your blackness in the closet, pulling it out only when it would be safe or would somehow benefit you?

            Finally, let us turn to the presumptuous second half of your post– not that I think a person doesn’t have the right to speak ,no matter what their race, but choke on it, you smug bastard: https://www.youtube.com/user/chrislrob/videos And if you still wanna trade stories, I’ve got a few, too.

          • Peter Gibson

            Right wing? Are you frikin kidding me? It’s “right wing” and “Republitard” and “Tea Baggy” now merely to disagree with your POV? Maybe I’m an Uncle Tom? Man you really do love painting the cheapest category lines around folks. I guess it makes for easily definable targets when you kick away, huh.

            And anyway, what really IS the disgusting bigotry that you’re trying to equivocate here and level on Brendan Eich? Please do tell what it is HE actually did to warrant such incredulous and total damnation from your side of this creepy coin. Seriously, just tell us what disgusting character flaw would you have this man carry on his shoulders for the rest of his natural life, for your cause?

            Jesus man, how can you even claim to know what bigotry is, and in the next breath throw such a disgusting attribute on this dude for donating a measly few bucks to some silly State Initiative that he likely only agreed to do as a favor to his frikin Mother in law. Your categorizations here are truly reprehensible. It’s nothing but fanatical accusation after accusation.

            Supporting heterosexual marriage? That is NOT bigotry. Not by ANY stretch of the imagination. Backwards? Sure. Stupid? Not according to HIS beliefs. Bigoted? Categorically NO. Yet you’ve been trying to paint this guy as nothing less than a sociopath who regularly took his van and 8 of his buddies out to “beat down queer boys on Friday nights after the drive-in pictures are finished”. You have been propelling the most insultingly casual abuse of the condition of bigotry I’ve ever seen, and then flinging it at a person who in no way, shape, or form, deserves the tar nor the feathers.

            And anyway, for the added Elephant in the room, tell me, who did you vote for? What party to you identify with? Because during that same year, according to your own incredible leap in logic, Obama, Hillary, and an OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of the Democratic Party are also stone bigots that need to be held accountable right frikin now. Where’s the boycott and petitions against the DNC? How many Democrats endorsed the Defense of Marriage Act that Bill Clinton signed into law in ’96? How many Democrats agreed, for the record, that ‘marriage is between a man and a woman, full stop’, in 2008? Care to venture a guess?

            Really, this is what your entire argument amounts to: Eich showed himself a bigot of such malevolence and low order that he needed to be ostracized, lose his professional station, and forfeit position in a company that the sweat of his own brow and years of his own prolific skill set helped advance. That’s utterly nonsense. Aggressive, fanatical nonsense.

            What you have been clouding in smoke and mirrors with this far overblown hyperbole is the fact that laws are what they are for this exact reason. Laws give, and laws take away. If you and those with whom you agree want to change a law, you can have at the process of changing it any bloody time. However, in the interim you don’t get to run around ostracizing, intimidating, and disrupting the professional lives of individuals that might disagree with you. Get it yet?

            Besides, gay marriage already won this battle, long ago, and rightfully so. There was no need to go around the battlefield years later, take scalps from the wounded, and pi$$ on the bloodied bodies. And that’s exactly what this amounts to.

            What you and your militant peeps have exercised in this case is no more “standing against
            bigotry” than the Brown Shirts were Freedom Fighters. It’s straight up abuse, intimidation, mob rule, bullying a person’s religious morals into acquiescence with your non-religious morals, or subjecting cruel punishment and abuse in absence thereof. This was nothing more than the systematic and purposed alienation of a man’s professional life simply for holding true to a personal religious belief.

            Brendan Eich NEVER said he was “against gay marriage” – he simply supported an organization that hoped to preserve traditional marriage under the existing law at the time…a profoundly different scenario than this incredulous description you and your peeps have been offering up. Hell, the way you’re describing him it’s as if he boiled Gay babies and ate them in a stew at every Thursday brunch, with a nice Bordeaux.

            Honestly, you lot are either straight up delusional, you’re being purposefully disingenuous, or you just can’t stop trying to intimidate and shout down anyone until you’ve assimilated everyone, Borg style. All you have to intimidate with is hyperbole and overblown, melodramatic fantasy about “the case of bigotry that wasn’t”.

            “As for your ridiculous “gay beacon” trash–tell me, black man, if you could “turn off” your “black beacon”, would you? Do you lie awake at night wishing you could be like the damn gays and keep your blackness in the closet, pulling it out only when it would be safe or would somehow
            benefit you?”

            First, thanks for that. I needed more low-brow bravado to remind me of your sickening puerile attitude.

            Second: With a gun held to my wife’s head as she’s being called a Chink and a n****lover, being felt up by one highway patrol while the other one belly laughs and slams his foot into my back as I’m hand cuffed, face down on I5? I WOULD have turned into Justin Beiber, were it possible. Should I ever be made to feel that way? Of course not, you insolent knucklehead. But go figure, these are the things that crosses one’s mind when they are ACTUALLY experiencing authentic BIGOTRY.

            And for the rest of that miserable vitriol, do go ahead and ask me that nonsense face to face sometime, I’ll be glad to oblige you with a proper answer.

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            i almost feel bad for not taking this on line by line. Almost. It is just a pile of exaggerations, misrepresentations, projections, and lies. What’s crazy is that anyone can read our entire exchange in 10 minutes and see that you are making a fool of yourself. You’ve called yourself a “Republitard” and “Tea Baggy”, not me. But as they say, if the shoe fits, lace that bitch up. I’ll say this, though, you’ve beat that straw man plumb to death. My favorite part is your vague threat that suggests that you were as likely responsible for your little skirmish in Nova Scotia as the ones you fought .Doesn’t sound like you made out to well, either. Probably a physical example of the verbal skills you show here–lots of huffing and puffing ending with you flopping on the ground screaming victim. In fact, you sure do get victimized a lot. Are you sure it’s not your personality?

          • Peter Gibson

            You’ve just proven to me that you have not one clue about the subject matter that has had you in here for hours, leveling bulls*** “Bigot” accusations like it’s cool.

            Aside from that, what a flaming pile of useless troll you turned out to be. Momma must be proud.

          • snafubar

            Well said.

          • TrollBaby

            Yes, either accept that gays are entitled to equal protection under the law or be marginalized with other historical bigots like Hitler and the KKK. No one cares anymore about what twisted rationale you have for being a bigot. America guarantees your right to be one, but your are not entitled to respect or a job based on your hate and bigotry. No, we will not tolerate your intolerance. Yes, we will marginalize you and make you feel as oppressed as you have made others feel because of your hate. Either deal with it or don’t, but we are the majority now and you will have to live in our world bigot!

          • Peter Gibson

            Sod off man. You have literally no idea how off the mark, irrational, and foolish this post has made you look.

          • TrollBaby

            You think we care what you think of us??? You are the losers in the trash bin of history. You can either accept reality or die bigot, but either way we will be collecting your scalp the next time you open your bigot mouth. Now sod that! Hahahahahaha!

          • Peter Gibson

            Yawn.

            So infantile, so petty, and so touched by undiagnosed mental illness. A perfect storm of inconsequential suck, sprinkled with all the pussified, cowardly trolling and buffoonery one can stand before being bored to sleep.

            But look! Is that a fan you have there TrollBaby? Aaaawww, now that’s actually quite precious. It’s TrollBaby, back for his Lastworditus episode, with the faithful support of his “bigot” kicking, take no prisoners pal Chris, the rainbow-colored pseudo-militant s*** disturber, complete with a few Duck Dynasty scalps on his belt…

            Wow, this must be what it feels like when you happen upon a perfectly matching set of shiny, wiggly, glow-in-the-dark, plastic vomit at the joke shop!!! Awesome.

            NOTICE TO THE ADULTS: Careful y’all, apparently Mommy forgot to change that WIFI password, and it would seem the little brats managed their way over the basement gate again.

          • infadelicious

            Trollbaby is aptly named… btw, Inconsequential Suck…………Great name for a band………..

          • TrollBaby

            Lol, a 4 paragraph response! I must have touched you in your special place….shhh don’t tell anyone it will be our little secret bigot! Hahahahahaha!

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            Stop it, TrollBaby! Peter is married! He’s no good for you anyway–gets into lots of scrapes and seems to end up on the losing end of all of them. My favorite part of his posts is their aggressiveness. The spittle-flecked rantings of a rage monster. And like most bigots, he used to love everyone, used to think gays were just people, but then [something] happened and now he sees that they are “rainbow-colored pseudo-militant s*** disturber[s]”. See? You can tell by his rhetoric that Pete once flew the gay pride flag proudly. Yep, we lost a fine ally in Peter. A hyper-aggressive, addlepated, bigoted, rage-filled fight machine, but a fine ally. He’s just the kind of guy we want on our side, right?

          • Peter Gibson

            I’m sorry, did I go over your normal 3 paragraph per month reading comprehension quota? My bad. I’ll keep it all down to twitter feed size from now on little worm, you might not be so intimidated… plus you can always ask an adult what the bigger words mean.

        • Bolshevism Lives

          equality of what? hatefulness? obtuseness? reactionary over-reaction? enjoy!

          • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

            Well at least your admitting that there’s plenty of that on the other side.

  • snafubar

    If I were Brendan Eich, I’d sure Mozilla for religious discrimination. He is being persecuted by Mozilla for his religious beliefs. He is being denied his INDIVIDUAL right by a US Corporation to practice what he believes. Many companies have been successfully sued for religious discrimination. What they are doing is un-Constitutional. And the LGBT mafia is behind it. Eventually this will blow up in their faces.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      Reynolds v. United States in 1878 already defined marriage as one man and one woman… Nobody, including conservatives, will admit it…

      • snafubar

        They are cowards who are afraid of ridicule.

      • WinstonBlakeLULZ

        *ONE MORE TIME*

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

          bok yemek

    • TrollBaby

      Corporations have every right to fire an employee who makes his religious practics public to the detriment of the corporation. You can’t be fired because of your religion, but if your religious practices negatively impact the bottom line because of your public expression of said beliefs you don’t have a right to keep your job. You can thank conservatives for the concept of at-will employment.

  • Frrrawm Rrrrahssiah Veeth Llyo

    There’s a pattern of dour jeremiads from Dartmouthians methinks, a fairly scant one but a pattern nonetheless. Not that I ultimately disagree with Matt but if the Internet proves to be that medium that shines facts and enlightenment wherever ignorance gathers and lurks, it won’t be because of these frowny-faced browbeatings. It’ll just be because that many of the “sycophants” and possibly even the tyrannical “fascists” finally come to Jesus and have important “aha” moments.

  • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

    The loss of privilege is not discrimination.

    • snafubar

      So now it is a “privilege” to practice religion in the USA according to the homosexual mafia? That’s funny, I always thought it was a Constitutional right.

      • TrollBaby

        You have the right to practice religion. You don’t have a right to be employed. I hear Hobby Lobby has room for bigots on their staff.

  • I_RIGHT_I

    It’s about time we look into this “Gay Mafia” allegation. It could be that once we get an honest AG installed he’ll take a look at the possibility of a RICO case against these people.

  • Rockon

    Yep, Christians know how this will end, for the souls they want to take down with them, is why Christians will keep fighting

  • albertoapardo

    This started as a good-ole pro-free speech post.

    And then it turned into an anti-gay marriage post.

    Lovin’ the veiled superiority. Y’know, not everyone who is pro-gay rights is a fascist or leftist or free-speech-conformist.

    Sickening.

    • http://www.chrislrobinson.com Chris L. Robinson

      Nope. It was ALWAYS an anti-gay marriage post. It just started off that way to lure us in’.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      Ben Dragon Sipariş duyuyorum… Satanism is a Jewish cult… The Synagogue of Sodomy will not tolerate blasphemy of their religious fággotry, they are illiterate gaytheists and fágnostics… all men are born of a woman.

      The Koran permits a man to have as many as four wives, but Saint Sodom Hussein Obama put on a yarmulke and prayed at the Wailing Wall… no Muslim would do this Miley Cyrus dry humping of demons, it is lipstick on a kosher píg… It was not a Muslim that wrote Obamacare… If anyone is anti-woman, it is the gay leftist L’Internationale… and they infest the education bureaucracy like AIDS.

      Fantasy is their medium of infinitization… Like the Zohar Jew who dry humps the Wailing Wall like Miley Cyrus trying to achieve an erotic union with their “Shekinah,” a masturbatory cosmos maker… or miss neo-kabbalah Madonna, “Like a Virgin.” It is another distraction rooted in Tikkun Olam paganism and Judaic word fetishism coming from linguists like Naom Chomsky over at M.I.T., who use the Talmud as a blueprint for an illusion of a parallel and false reality.

  • Marc Delphine

    Don’t you people read? Haven’t you learned anything from history?

    That was such a telling question, Mr. Walsh. It clearly shows who you are as a journalist (and please read). As a gay man, I too am disgusted with this witch hunt and the consequences of innocent people like Eich getting caught in the cross hairs. Had the focal point of your article been on the fact that there are so many people who face similar consequences due to a political rampage caused by any (and practically all) minority group breaking through into the mainstream, you may have had me locked in agreement and on your side. Had you suggested this has to end because there has been too much hate on all sides of this equation and like a good Christian, you turn the other cheek and hold out your hand to reach out to a community that is getting its day in the sun but may look back and regret some of the mistakes its making as it is (finally) getting its equality…you would have won this argument.

    Alas, you will lose this one.

    First, if you were a true Christian, there would be no “you people” – a separation between you and others is very un-Christian-like and speaks to your own ignorance of your own religion and of history. Have ye any idea what “these people” (including me) have gone through from so-called “Christians” who have killed, bashed, jailed, refused service, denied a job/housing/business deals all because gays & lesbians are as God made us (something we have been for thousands of years and is NOT a choice?) BTW – Sorry that you’ve gotten “hate mail” but that pales in comparison to what “Christians” have done to gays for thousands of years.

    You would have done just fine to merely suggest the witch hunt has to end. You would have won points with right-leaning gays & lesbians like me (I’m Libertarian, but far from the socialist/fascist/communist/progressive LGBT folk I know) had you just said “hey, sorry for what my religion did to “you people” for millennia but your two-year long witch hunt is enough, let’s move on…even though I believe in regulating marriage and discriminating against anyone who cannot procreate.” (your words: “marriage is meant to be the context in which this reproduction occurs” again shows your ignorance.

    Quick question: should women who can’t carry a child or men who shoot blanks also be forced to live by your rules and be denied equal treatment under the law, regardless of who they want to marry? If they cannot have children, is that the criteria for being denied a government-sanctioned marriage? Churches should be allowed to marry whomever they want; but, in contrast to that freedom consenting adults should have, is your ill-advised argument and one totally off-topic from your original headline of “You are what you say we are.”

    Here’s another comical and yet horrible argument you made: “Bigotry? There is nothing bigoted about it. This is mere science. You see, bigotry only enters into the conversation when you try to destroy a man’s life just for participating in the conversation.” This is the EXACT argument used to deny interracial marriage by white Christian males just decades ago. Further, actions like “trying to destroy a man’s life” can be found in practically every Supreme Court argument in cases like Dred Scott v. Sanford.

    Unfortunately, and I think you and your readers know this – YOU are losing (the marriage argument) just as “Christians” lost it when we began to realize that interracial marriage is not an abomination, just as two consenting adults who cannot procreate (for any reason). Your insistence on fighting against your own principles of limited government and keeping government out of your church is causing people to hate and divide even more (including both the left and the right) as we separate and separate even more (again, very un-Chrisian-like). Stop arguing for “traditional marriage” because it has always changed with the times and will continue to. Marriage is not for a government (or your religion) to regulate, so please stop being a hypocrite and an ignorant leader of a pack of readers with whom reasonable people like me might otherwise agree.

    But I digress, just as you and your argument did from the topic of Eich being forced out due to a witch hunt – which we both agree needs to end. Focusing on this crazy time in our history is legitimate and worthy of your own journalistic integrity, Mr. Walsh. Acting like a petulant child who has no understanding or recognition of what havoc and hatred and despair YOUR religion (et al) has done to this particular community is causing you to lose not only this argument, but potential readers like myself who would otherwise agree with a capitalist who knows we’re under attack by socialism, in whatever form (or sexuality) it shows itself.

  • Marc Delphine

    “Don’t you people read? Haven’t you learned anything from history?”

    That was such a telling question, Mr. Walsh. It clearly shows who you are as a journalist (and please read). As a gay man, I too am disgusted with this witch hunt and the consequences of innocent people like Eich getting caught in the cross hairs. Had the focal point of your article been on the fact that there are so many people who face similar consequences due to a political rampage caused by any (and practically all) minority group breaking through into the mainstream, you may have had me locked in agreement and on your side. Had you suggested this has to end because there has been too much hate on all sides of this equation and like a good Christian, you turn the other cheek and hold out your hand to reach out to a community that is getting its day in the sun but may look back and regret some of the mistakes its making as it is (finally) getting its equality…you would have won this argument.

    The way you win an argument is with credibility which builds trust and trust makes the sale (you really don’t have to convince your avid fans/readers; it is people like me that you should be trying to convince and unfortunately, you have zero credibility in this argument.

    So alas, it is you who will lose this one.

    First, if you were a true Christian, there would be no “you people” – a separation between you and others is very un-Christian-like and speaks to your ignorance of your own religion and of history, in general. Have ye any idea what “these people” (including me) have gone through from so-called “Christians” who have killed, bashed, jailed, refused service, denied a job/housing/business deals all because gays & lesbians are as God made us (something we have been for thousands of years and is NOT a choice?) BTW – Sorry that you’ve gotten “hate mail” but that pales in comparison to what “Christians” have done to gays for thousands of years.

    You would have done just fine to merely suggest the witch hunt has to end. You would have won points with right-leaning gays & lesbians like me (I’m Libertarian, but far from the socialist/fascist/communist/progressive LGBT folk I know) had you just said “hey, sorry for what my religion did to “you people” for millennia but your two-year long witch hunt is enough, let’s move on…even though I believe in regulating marriage and discriminating against anyone who cannot procreate.” (your words: “marriage is meant to be the context in which this reproduction occurs” again shows your ignorance.

    Quick question: should women who can’t carry a child or men who shoot blanks also be forced to live by your rules and be denied equal treatment under the law, regardless of who they want to marry? If they cannot have children, is that the criteria for being denied a government-sanctioned marriage? Churches should be allowed to marry whomever they want; but, in contrast to that freedom consenting adults should have, is your ill-advised argument and one totally off-topic from your original headline of “You are what you say we are.”

    Here’s another comical and yet horrible argument you made: “Bigotry? There is nothing bigoted about it. This is mere science. You see, bigotry only enters into the conversation when you try to destroy a man’s life just for participating in the conversation.” This is the EXACT argument used to deny interracial marriage by white Christian males just decades ago. Further, actions like “trying to destroy a man’s life” can be found in practically every Supreme Court argument in cases like Dred Scott v. Sanford.

    Unfortunately, and I think you and your readers know this – YOU are losing (the marriage argument) just as “Christians” lost it when we began to realize that interracial marriage is not an abomination, just as two consenting adults who cannot procreate (for any reason). Your insistence on fighting against your own principles of limited government and keeping government out of your church is causing people to hate and divide even more (including both the left and the right) as we separate and separate even more (again, very un-Chrisian-like). Stop arguing for “traditional marriage” because it has always changed with the times and will continue to. Marriage is not for a government (or your religion) to regulate, so please stop being a hypocrite and an ignorant leader of a pack of readers with whom reasonable people like me might otherwise agree.

    But I digress, just as you and your argument did from the topic of Eich being forced out due to a witch hunt – which we both agree needs to end. Focusing on this crazy time in our history is legitimate and worthy of your own journalistic integrity, Mr. Walsh. Acting like a petulant child who has no understanding or recognition of what havoc and hatred and despair YOUR religion (et al) has done to this particular community is causing you to lose not only this argument, but potential readers like myself who would otherwise agree with a capitalist who knows we’re under attack by socialism, in whatever form (or sexuality) it shows itself.

  • http://www.roscoeland.blogspot.com Ross

    Good on you.

  • marylamb72

    BRAVO!!

  • Abe

    Can you people just admit that you hate gays so we can actually have a productive conversation about how wrong you are?

    • Roninf9

      Why should I not hate homosexualists.

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ Winston Blake

      You people all believe the same thing…

      You all believe your weenies come from heaven and that this gives you some sanctified right to be divine pricks passing your collection plate at gunpoint for the gods of communism (yourselves).

  • Carlos Ranger

    It is not enough to leave people alone and to expect that you will be left alone. (Such a quaint notion). You must embrace and celebrate every lifestyle and publicly state your unequivocal support. We say that to be opposed to redefining marriage is exactly the same as supporting racial segregation. Whether such a statement is supported by logic is irrelevant; it is so because we SAY it is so and we will continue to say so at a very high and continuous volume. Convert or be shunned. There is no need to debate or convince, this is a religious crusade and we do not suffer heretics. Eich was merely the first. Every person who supported Prop 8 or any similar measure in any state will be outed and shunned! One nation, one Reich, one volk!

  • Carlos Ranger
  • Seven

    Nothing about this was well written…it was terrified banter from a thankfully dying religion. Gay rights have nothing to do with free speech, in this country, EVERY single person is entitled to the exact same standard of living. Because your Bronze Age mythology dictates hate and stupidity, does not make it right. People following doctrine from the time that it was adamantly believed that the earth was flat will always lose, because it is so drastically out of touch with reality that the people who will survive laugh so fervently at the petty attempts to quell the natural progress of life. All religion is an agent of the past. Grow up. Your “rapture” will never come. Just your ignorant demise. The fact that gay rights angers you so is pathetic, BECAUSE, it has absolutely nothing to do with you. As a great man once said, “If gay marriage angers you so, then don’t marry a gay person!”

    Now kindly silence your childish hate.

  • Emiliano Babarah

    Oh my God, I’m so glad to tell everyone the real thing that happen to me…My name is EMILIANO BABARAH. If i refuse to share this testimony it means i am selfish to my self and to people i love so much whom might have similar problems, March 16th about something 7:23pm after taken our dinner my husband got crazy started calling a lady name Melisa I love you, i was so mad and started crying like a baby…then my husband left home for the idiot called Melisa, and never return back home then i believed when he uthen nderstand his self he will surly come back to apology, but instead he left me So i complained to my friend she told me she was having such problems in her marriage until she was introduce to DR ORIOMON who specializes in bringing back broken homes and broken marriages DR ORIOMON cast a spell for me in May 4th surprisingly my husband came home May 6th apologizing that i should forgive him that it will never happen again, i was so glad and gave the thanks to DR ORIOMON who save my marriage, if you are having similar problem you can contact him and His email address is (oriomonspiritualtemple@yahoo.com) you can still save your marriage if u really love your husband.

    Thanks EMILIANO BABARAH_USA

  • Chris

    Furthermore, these asses only took someone like me who was on the fence re: the gay marriage issue, and helped me make up my mind. To treat a man that way? My sympathy and support are gone.

  • R

    Are you really suggesting that ONLY heterosexuals can reproduce? Really? Because:
    1. There are infertile heterosexual couples, and they can still get married.
    2. A trans woman and a cis woman can reproduce.
    3. Bisexuals, pansexuals, and other polys can reproduce.
    Heterosexuals do NOT have some monopoly on makin’ babies.

  • lol

    Cry harder, bigots.

  • Obscurely Named Dude

    It’s a little late for April Fools’ Day, don’t you think? Or is this website actually real?

  • Ellie

    Oh gosh, this is just gold. It’s hilarious. I refuse to believe this isn’t exquisite satire.

  • heyheythere

    I’m just waiting for gay people to be gay not Gay. It’s pretty sad if your entire personality is who you like to f***. Be a person first.

  • Pax Humana

    I only wish that I could deliver a variant of that to What Would JT Do and all of the other atheist blogs ON Patheos. I want to see the atheists squirms as well as their allies, including the LGBTTIQAP coalition.

  • Elevator2TheTop

    This is hands down one of the best rebuttals I have encountered to date of this entire inane debate. It has always sickened/saddened me how I am characterized as filled with hate, when I have done nothing but accept and even advocate for my homosexual acquaintances. I am brow-beaten, maligned, intimidated and even coerced into aligning with a viewpoint with which I do not agree. So, while young and old alike are easily swayed, while Christians in not small numbers surrender their birthrights to these bully antagonists, I steadfastly remain squarely in line with millennia of human civilization, and advocate that marriage is between one man and one woman, period. May God help the United States of America.

More from Young Conservatives: